GH-50758: [CI][C++] Use LLVM 22 on Debian experimental - #50759
Open
tadeja wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
@github-actions crossbow submit test-debian-experimental-cpp-gcc-15 |
|
Revision: a1016b9 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-dfa4da6a1b
|
tadeja
changed the title
tadeja
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 31, 2026 15:54
tadeja
requested review from
assignUser,
jonkeane,
kou and
raulcd
as code owners
July 31, 2026 15:54
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Fix #50758 -
llvm-toolchain-20package was removed from Debian experimental on Jul 14, so the nightlytest-debian-experimental-cpp-gcc-15fails withE: Unable to locate package clang-20/llvm-20-dev.What changes are included in this PR?
Update LLVM 20 to 22 on Debian experimental in
dev/tasks/tasks.ymlAre these changes tested?
Yes, built locally and verified via crossbow.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.